I landed in London, over a week ago now, and felt an
irrepressible grin take hold of my face. The reality of my latest journey
having truly begun, after months of planning (nearly a full year since I began
my application for this program), finally sank in as I walked through Heathrow.
But that was only part of my excitement: I was in London.
I would never have expected to be so excited about visiting
this city, but I guess over the last several years of reading the BBC, watching
British tv shows, becoming increasingly familiar with the culture, and meeting
many wonderful people who had claimed the city as home at one point or another,
I’d worked up a subconscious curiosity about it. The U.K. is easily the country
I know most about of those I’ve never visited. Without my realizing it, it’s
been in the background of my mind as a sort of friendly “Other”, a reflection
of my own country—or some sort of parallel universe. London and New York, the
U.K. and the U.S. occupy similar spaces for most of the world, and yet there’s a
distinct identity (primarily reinforced by them). Comparisons between the two places abound.
As I navigated my way to meet up with a friend, I walked
into a place that had only existed in my mind. I paid for my ticket with
POUNDS! I was on THE UNDERGROUND! It was charming and small! I emerged from the
station and all of the buildings
around me were stunning and I was in
awe. Give me a few years in this place, I thought. Let me repeat: I had zero
expectation of feeling this way. But I recognized my behavior. It was the same
as someone from another country visiting the U.S. for the first time and seeing
the iconic NYC sites and recognizing that, yes, this was the place in the
movies and books and news. There’s something about being, in the flesh, in
places that permeate our culture and our imaginations for years before we visit
in person.
I was thinking about how the U.S. holds that position for
many people around the world, and how it’s our cultural hegemony that engenders
such widespread curiosity and desire to come to the U.S., not just hopes for
prosperity (even if this is commonly expressed). On the other hand, I was also
thinking about how different such a trip would be for someone coming from a
developing country or the Global South. In my case, patriotic narratives and America’s global stature easily counterbalance British critiques of the U.S., but many others
would have been told implicitly or explicitly that this other, more powerful
country and culture was superior to theirs. The internet and other new
technologies both challenge and reinforce this dynamic.
A recent map showing all
the countries Britain has invaded reveals the global spread of its potential
cultural influence. Source. |
My entire time in London, I didn’t think for a moment about
the fact that Botswana had been a colony of the U.K. That even if Botswana
wasn’t itself Britain’s most lucrative colony, it was still part of a structure
that gave the country wealth and power in the international arena, that had
helped install British culture as a dominant aesthetic. Botswana had made
London lovely, and I didn’t even notice it until I had landed in Gaborone.
When I left Ghana last year, I had a layover in Amsterdam, where
I was also charmed by the beauty of a European city. I stopped into the
Rijksmuseum and saw a portrait of a couple that had been based in Elmina,
Ghana. The placard announced that they’d worked for the Dutch West India
Company, which traded in gold and slaves from Ghana for nearly 300 years before
the British took over. I remember the jolt of connecting the two sides of the
same story, having seen the slave forts and trading posts owned by the Dutch in
both Ghana and Benin. A recent AIAC post on Dutch denial/ignorance of their historical slavery practices notes that less
than half of Dutch history textbooks in a recent study so much as mentioned
slavery, and even in those, the emphasis was on hardships the Dutch colonists
suffered, rather than those of the slaves. Walking through that museum less
than a day after leaving Ghanaian soil, I was taken aback by the normalization
of this terrible history and the narrow-minded focus on what the Dutch got out
of this trade, the nostalgic pride in the Dutch empire at its peak. Ghanaians
certainly hadn’t forgotten the price of that empire.
In Gaborone, I stood on my new balcony and looked out at the
dusty scrub in the afternoon sun and crisp, dry air, wondering at the
difference in my reaction to arriving here. I was excited, exhilarated and
absurdly happy, to be sure, but the truth of it was I just didn’t know Botswana
and its cultural references as I did the U.K., and that’s a sad fact. Normally
the lure of exploring the unknown is a huge part of the joy of travel, but I’d
sampled another style of encountering a foreign place the previous day and I
couldn’t help but feel I was missing out. What would it have been like to feel
in Gaborone that same sense of arrival in a mythical place?
Botswana challenges popular notions of “Africa” – including
my own, based on previous travels. (This is not terribly surprising.) The
airport lacked that smell of heat and fruit and human bodies that has greeted
me in Uganda, Tanzania and Ghana. Sometimes I think I’m in Arizona. The city,
like the rest of the country, is sparsely populated and the lack of traffic,
the lack of bustle, the relative lack of streetside vendors throws me off a
little. The clinic is, as my housemate said, “nicer than any clinic [she’s]
seen in the U.S.” and the teens I work with would fit in at your typical
American middle school. I live in a wealthy area, and have only been here a
week, so my perception is drastically limited, but I like that I’m forced to
re-evaluate perceptions of the continent I didn’t quite realize (still) I had.
Modernity is someone saying to you: look, we have made you better. And you believing it.But the question is not how to retreat or how to prune yourself back to some pristine, native state. In fact, it is the opposite: how to recognize the narrowness of this so-called broadened mind – to realize that Europe is not the universe – and to take your sensing and knowing beyond those dominant ideas of the true, the good, and the beautiful. To move towards a pluri-verse that gives dignity to both the girl in the pajamas and the one in the little black dress – and yet to do so in a way that, unlike Western liberalism, is not naïve about either the ‘equality’ of the two, or about how we got from the one to the other.
I loved London, truly, but I don't want to lose sight of its
context. And I look forward to wondering at all that makes Botswana magnificent.
Danielle,
ReplyDeleteHave you met any Botswanans who have visited London? Do or would they have a similar sense of mythology and captivation as you did, despite the colonial history? Or is their impression of London always mediated by the colonial history? Would their experience be rather similar to the Singaporean girl?
Although she gets there because she took a class on decolonial aesthesis. Is this type of schooling in the current Western intellectual obsession required to maintain a sense of your cultural identity and heritage in the face of Western cultural hegemony?
ReplyDeleteOh, well I don't see the reactions as mutually exclusive at all—I sensed a fair degree of captivation in the young Singaporean woman’s encounters with Europe (one that persists even as she embraces decolonial aesthesis), only that I was privileged not to have a captivation complicated by confusion, culture shock or a sense of inferiority. I wouldn't claim to speak for all Motswana or all people in the developing world, of course, but it’s pretty undeniable that there is a far greater awareness and curiosity about the US and UK here than there is of Botswana/elsewhere from the West. I think "the West" as a whole (and specifically the US and UK, or France for francophone countries) holds a mythical and captivating place for much of the world--obviously to varying degrees and drastically varying in how positively, negatively or ambivalently it’s perceived--simply on the basis of how prevalent awareness of its culture is.
ReplyDeleteBut, yes, for much of the world, I would expect the experience would be closer to that of the Singaporean girl than to mine. Personally, I felt that sense of curiosity in large part because my country is so often compared to the UK, but it was a comparison on an equal footing, which is not the case for much of the world. Certainly I have heard Batswana (and people of many other nationalities) compare their own country unfavorably to the West, even while also expressing devotion to and appreciation of their own countries. I’ve recently been reading Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah, which primarily deals with Nigerians navigating immigrant lives in the US and UK, and the discrepancies between their perceptions of these countries and of Nigeria from one place and time to another. It’s a more beautiful and nuanced rendering of how colonial relations, distance (geographic, economic, social, linguistic, etc) and relative cultural pervasiveness shape these perceptions than I could ever offer.
As for your second question, I don’t know that I have an answer. I would nitpick a bit with your characterization of such thought as “the current Western intellectual obsession”: although it is working its way into the (Western-dominated) academy and for many people wouldn’t be accessible without the rest of Western education, the decolonial movement originates in Latin America, and the postcolonial movement is similarly spearheaded by non-Western scholars and thinkers. I would say that such *schooling* probably isn’t strictly necessary but the existence of such *thought* is necessary, especially for those of us entrenched in and perpetuating the hegemony of Western culture.